Sample report — fictional data. Your report will reflect your own answers.
Solo Preview Report

Solo Structural Preview

Prepared for: Alex
Report date: 15 July 2026
This report shows how you experience your household — from your answers alone. It does not include your partner's perspective.
Section 1

Solo Structural Snapshot

59 out of 100
Composite score
A system under uneven pressure.
Your overall score sits in the middle of the range — but the average is deceptive. Some areas of your household are working well, and others are under real strain. The detail below shows where the weight is actually sitting.
SC — How We're Organised
72
RS — Time, Money & Capacity
41
DA — Where We're Headed
82
FM — Conflict & Recovery
53
AC — How We Adapt
48
Section 2

Perception–Reality Gap

Your gut feeling
70
You rated things 7 out of 10
+11
Gap
Your actual score
59
From your 25 answers
Mild overestimate

Before the assessment, you estimated things were working at a 7 out of 10. Your detailed answers scored the household at 59 out of 100 — an 11-point gap.

This is a mild overestimate. Your intuitive sense of how things are going is a bit more optimistic than what the structure actually shows. That's not unusual — the areas that are working well (Direction: 82, Organisation: 72) create a feeling that things are broadly fine, even though Resources (41) and Adaptability (48) are under more pressure than the overall picture suggests.

The gap isn't alarming, but it's worth noticing. The places where your gut feel and the reality diverge are exactly the areas most likely to create friction that feels unexpected.

Section 3

Structural Imbalance Index

41
Moderate imbalance
Scale: 0 (perfectly balanced) to 100 (extreme concentration)

Your SII score of 41 means the pressure in your household isn't spread evenly — it's concentrated in specific areas while others are carrying much less load.

The spread tells the story: your highest-scoring pillar (Direction: 82) and lowest (Resources: 41) are 41 points apart. You and your partner are clear on where you're headed and how the household is organised — but the day-to-day reality of getting there, the time, money, and energy it takes, is under real strain. Adaptability (48) is also sitting low, which means the system's ability to flex when things change is limited.

Moderate imbalance is common, but it matters because the strong areas can make the whole picture feel more stable than it is. The pressure doesn't go away — it just sits in the places you're less likely to notice until something breaks.

Section 4

False Stability Pattern

Detected
Masking area
82 Where We're Headed
Under strain
41 Time, Money & Capacity
48 How We Adapt

A false stability pattern is present. Your sense of shared direction is strong — you and your partner agree on where you're headed, and that shared sense of purpose can make everything feel broadly okay.

But the day-to-day reality of getting there is under real strain. Resources (41) suggests the time, money, and energy needed to execute on that shared direction are stretched thin. Adaptability (48) means the household doesn't flex easily when circumstances shift — and circumstances always shift.

The clarity on direction is genuine. But it may be hiding how stretched things actually are in the areas that keep the household running day to day. Strong direction without adequate resources creates a system that knows where it's going but can't sustain the pace needed to get there.

Section 5

Internal Consistency

Within each pillar, you answered five questions. If those answers broadly agree with each other, it means you have a clear picture of how that area works. If they point in different directions, it means you yourself aren't sure — and that uncertainty is a finding worth knowing about.

Where We're Headed
88 · Clear picture
How We're Organised
74 · Mostly clear
Time, Money & Capacity
62 · Mostly clear
How We Adapt
55 · Mixed signals
Conflict & Recovery
45 · Mixed signals

Your clearest picture is Direction (88) — you know exactly how you feel about where the household is headed. Organisation (74) and Resources (62) are mostly consistent too.

But two areas flagged mixed signals. Your answers about how disagreements get resolved (Conflict & Recovery: 45) pointed in different directions — which suggests you're not sure yourself how conflict actually works in your household. That's worth noticing. Adaptability (55) showed a similar pattern: some answers suggested the household adjusts well to change, others suggested it doesn't.

When your own picture of an area is unclear, it often means the area doesn't have a consistent pattern — things work sometimes but not others, depending on circumstances. That inconsistency is a structural finding in itself, and it matters before your partner even enters the picture.

Section 6

What this report
can't tell you.

Everything above comes from your answers alone. It's a real and valuable starting point — but there are three things a solo view can't show:

1
How your partner sees the same five areas. Their scores for Organisation, Resources, Direction, Conflict, and Adaptability may be very different from yours — and those differences are usually where the most important insight lives.
2
Where you two see things differently. The divergence between your view and your partner's view — pillar by pillar — is what surfaces the coordination gaps that no amount of conversation reliably reveals on its own.
3
Which gaps between your views are creating the most friction. Not all perception differences are equal. The full report identifies the specific divergence points generating the most repeated friction — and gives you structured conversation prompts to address them.

These three things — your partner's view, where you differ, and which differences matter most — require both partners. That's what the full report adds.

Your partner may see all of this differently.

Add your partner to find out where. They answer the same 25 questions independently. The full report shows where your views align and where they don't — and that's where the real friction hides. $30 to complete the full assessment.
Start Solo Preview — $19 →
Your answers carry over to the full report. Nothing is re-entered or wasted.
Clarity guarantee — If your report doesn't surface at least one structural insight you hadn't identified on your own, full refund. No questions.