25 questions, about 15 minutes. Start on your own with a Solo Preview ($19) or go straight to the full two-partner assessment ($49).
Your report arrives within 48 hours — showing exactly where daily coordination works, where it strains, and where you two see things differently.
Whether you start solo or go straight to the full assessment, both paths lead to the same complete picture. The solo path just lets one person go first.
Path A — Start Solo: One partner answers the 25 questions alone. You receive a Solo Preview report showing how you experience the household — perception gap, structural imbalance, false stability patterns, and internal consistency. Your partner can join later.
Path B — Go Direct: Both partners answer the same 25 questions independently, privately, at your own pace. Neither sees the other's responses before the report is generated.
Solo Preview: Your answers produce four findings — how accurately you see your household, whether pressure is concentrated or spread evenly, where strong areas may be masking weak ones, and how clear your own picture is in each area. See a sample Solo Preview report →
Full Report: Both partners' responses are scored across five domains. Each domain receives a strength score and a distance score — showing not just how strong the system is, but how differently each partner perceives it.
Solo Preview or Full Report — delivered by email within 48 hours. The solo preview shows four findings from your data alone. The full report adds divergence analysis, top pressure points, per-pillar conversation prompts, and a 7-day stabilisation plan.
If you started solo, your partner can join anytime in the next 90 days. They answer the same 25 questions, you pay the $30 difference, and the full divergence report generates automatically. Your original answers carry over — nothing is re-entered. Same $49 total as going direct.
Every couple's daily coordination is evaluated across five domains. These are not personality traits or emotional states — they are structural features of how two people organise a shared life.
Four decades of research into how households actually function has consistently shown that structural clarity — who decides what, how resources are coordinated, how the household recovers after disagreement — predicts long-term stability more reliably than emotional compatibility. Separately, research by sociologist Allison Daminger (2019) documented that the invisible cognitive work of running a household falls asymmetrically on one partner in most couples — not from lack of goodwill, but from unclear structure. Both findings shaped what Family Clarity Test measures and how it weights the divergence between partners' perspectives.
Why FaCT is grounded in research →Each of the five areas produces two scores — a strength score and a distance score. Together they tell a more complete story than a single number ever could.
The strength score is the average of both partners' responses within a domain. It reflects how well that area of daily coordination is currently functioning for the couple as a unit.
A score of 75+ is supportive — the system is working in this area. A score of 55–74 is mixed — functioning, but with room for improvement. Below 55 indicates the domain is under meaningful load and likely generating repeated friction.
The distance score measures how differently both partners experience the same domain. It is the absolute difference between their individual scores — not a measure of fault, but a measure of misalignment in perception.
A distance of 20+ points is significant. It means both partners may be living inside the same household but experiencing a particular area of it in genuinely different ways — which makes coordination harder without either person realising why.
Five neutral categories. No judgement, no predictions — just a description of where your cooperative system currently sits, and a clear starting point for what comes next.
When two partners experience the same household area very differently, the gap is not a sign that one person is wrong. It is a signal that expectations or definitions have never been made explicit — and that a single structured conversation can close what months of unstructured talking could not.
Every domain produces a distance score — the gap between each partner's individual score. A small gap means both partners perceive the domain similarly. A large gap means they are experiencing the same system in genuinely different ways.
If both partners completed the questionnaire together — discussing, agreeing, compromising — the responses would reflect the negotiated middle, not the genuine individual experience. That is precisely what produces the blind spots that the assessment is designed to surface.
Independent completion means the distance score is real. When the report shows a 28-point gap in FM — Conflict & Recovery, it means one partner genuinely experiences that area very differently from the other — not that one of them is wrong, but that both are working from different unspoken definitions of the same situation.
The report's job is to surface that gap. The conversation prompts are the first step toward closing it.
A private report delivered to both partners. Not a summary of problems — a structural map with specific scores, specific gaps, and specific starting points for the conversations that matter.
The language, methodology, and output are all structured to help couples understand their coordination system — without crossing into therapy, diagnosis, or any clinical territory.
Five questions. Two minutes. An instant score — no sign-up, no email. The full report goes deeper, but this will show you which area is under the most pressure right now.
Take the 2-minute check →Start solo with your own view, or go straight to the full two-partner assessment. Either way — 25 questions, 48-hour delivery, no jargon.
Full Report — $49 Start Solo — $19